Just saw this ad on TV. Wow.
If you thought it couldn't get worse than the Snuggie, you would be mistaken.
from TV to the Internet to TV and back again
fought for health care reform & now figuring out what's next
The Miami Herald ran an opinion column this morning entitled "And the GOP front-runner is..." in which Doyle McManus of The LA Times writes: The race for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination started in earnest last week at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington.Here's the problem. If the nomination started in earnest at CPAC and we're talking about the front-runner, shouldn't we actually mention the front-runner? Take a look at the results of both CPAC straw polls:
So let’s get started. Here’s the conventional wisdom, fresh from the corridors of power, on the state of the Republican race:
There are really only two spots on the GOP ballot. One is reserved for Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor who won nine primaries in 2008. The other is for someone who isn’t Mitt Romney — someone like Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee or Tim Pawlenty.

Ron Paul won both CPAC straw polls - the First Choice ballot and the Combo choice ballot - and yet this piece makes no mention of him anywhere. If you title something "And the GOP front-runner is..." and you cite CPAC as the start of the nomination in earnest, how can you pretend the winner of the polls just doesn't exist? If you have an opinion of who might top the Republican ticket and you want to write that piece, great. But you can't use CPAC as your lead-in or proof if you're going to completely dismiss the guy who actually won.I don't believe Ron Paul is going to be the Republican presidential nominee in 2012 - and clearly neither does McManus - but at the very least, he should explain why he's written off Ron Paul.
Scott budget eliminates homeless aidRight underneath it:
Senator: Prison cuts won't flyScott wants to get rid of Florida's Office of Homelessness and privatize its prison system - firing 1,700 workers and shifting 1,500 prisoners to facilities that get paid per inmate. The Economist explains why a for-profit prison system is problematic:
Some experts contend that firms in the prison business reap profits by billing government for rather more than their initial lowball estimates while scrimping in ways that may make prisons less secure.Sounds a lot like Rick Scott's style when he ran Columbia/HCA.
As I mentioned briefly last week, I've been nursing a banged up lower back. The pain's not subsiding so I made an appointment to see an orthopedist. Let's call him Dr. K. 1. C's a problem, and we know it, but she's Dr. G's assistant (another doc), and she keeps him from blowing up at patients (no joke) so we keep her around.and
2. The MRI facility should have told us your report was here because we get lots of reports, and we can't be bothered to check all the time.and
3. We have plenty of patients so while you seem like lovely people, we don't need your business so if you never come back, it's no biggie for us.
I'd embed this video, but I can't find the code so you'll have to click through to watch.
Despite my New Year's resolution to get back to blogging more, you've probably noticed things have been unusually quiet 'round these parts. I now can explain why.